Evolving types of pudendal neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Introduction: Sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and overactive bladder yield good and reliable results. However, neuromodulation research is continuously evolving because there is still need for more patient-friendly treatment options in the therapeutic management of LUTD. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) has been emerging as a promising alternative treatment option for the last few decades. The aim of this study is to review the current state of the art of PNM. Material and methods: A wide literature search was conducted in the field of PNM using Medline through the PubMed database and Elsevier using the Scopus database; a critical review of the results was then carried out. PNM has been studied in its various possible aspects: percutaneous PNM, transrectal/transvaginal PNM, and both percutaneous and transcutaneous dorsal genital nerve stimulation. Results: Each technique was found to result in promising improvements in different clinical outcomes, with some trials reporting even better results than sacral neuromodulation. Conclusions: As a result of a comparison between the various PNM techniques with both sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation, we think that PNM should be seen as seriously promising, and we believe it will expand the treatment options for overactive bladder. Even though several studies accordingly showed PNM to be safe and effective, a systematic review and meta-analysis were not feasible. PNM in its various techniques is a promising treatment for LUTD. Nevertheless, further research is needed to include it in treatment algorithms.

Current position of neuromodulation for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite established effectiveness in overactive bladder and nonobstructive retention, neuromodulation's application in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) remains a topic of ongoing research. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in neuromodulation as treatment of IC/BPS offering guidance for healthcare practitioners dealing with IC/BPS cases. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research underlines the promising role of sacral, tibial and pudendal neuromodulation in management of IC/BPS symptoms. Studies reveal encouraging outcomes, particularly in alleviating urgency and frequency symptoms. However, while urgency and frequency symptoms tend to improve, comprehensive pain relief remains a challenge. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) stand out due to their minimal invasive nature. Existing literature points to the need for larger prospective studies with extended follow-up periods to validate the efficacy and sustainability of neuromodulation. SUMMARY: Neuromodulation is a promising treatment modality for refractory IC/BPS. Due to the minimal invasive nature, they should be tried before rigorous surgery. However, the limited quantity of available data and the variability in pain relief outcomes necessitate cautious interpretation. The review emphasizes the need for further research.

What Is in the Pipeline on Investigational Neuromodulation Techniques for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Overactive bladder (OAB) affects millions of patients worldwide. Its treatment is challenging but improves the patient's quality of life. Besides standard techniques for neuromodulation (sacral and pudendal neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation), several new techniques have been investigated to treat symptoms of refractory OAB. The purpose of the present review is to outline the state of the art of new neuromodulation techniques for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In March 2023, a comprehensive MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus search was carried out (keywords: LUTD, new technologies, neuromodulation, LUTS, OAB, painful bladder syndromes, etc). Articles were included according to inclusion (randomized controlled trials, prospective trials, large retrospective studies) and exclusion (case reports, outcomes not clearly expressed in full text, animal studies) criteria. The reference lists of the included studies also were scanned. Both adult and pediatric populations were included, in addition to both neurogenic and nonneurogenic OAB. A narrative review was then performed. RESULTS: Peroneal neuromodulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, magnetic nerve stimulation, and parasacral transcutaneous neuromodulation are the most studied investigative techniques and were shown to yield promising results in treating OAB symptoms. Most studies showed promising results even in the complex scenarios of patients with OAB refractory to standard treatments. Comparing investigational techniques with standard of care and their respective clinical outcomes and safety profiles, and confronting their pros and cons, we reasonably believe that once such treatment modalities are further developed, they could play a role in the OAB treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Although the described neuromodulation techniques are being intensely studied, the available results are not yet sufficient for any guidelines to recommend their use.

Difference between brain temperature and core temperature in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care management for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients aims to prevent secondary cerebral damage. Targeted temperature management is one option to prevent cerebral damage, as hypothermia may have protective effects. By conducting a systematic literature review we evaluated: 1) the presence of a temperature difference (gradient) between brain temperature (Tb) and core temperature (Tc) in TBI patients; and 2) clinical factors associated with reported differences. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed database was systematically searched using Mesh terms and key words, and Web of Sciences was assessed for additional article citations. We included studies that continuously and simultaneously measured Tb and Tc in severe TBI patients. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was modified to fit the purpose of our study. Statistical data were extracted for further meta-analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 16 studies, with a total of 480 patients. Clinical heterogeneity consisted of Tb/Tc measurement site, measurement device, physiological changes, local protocols, and medical or surgical interventions. The studies have a high statistical heterogeneity (I2). The pooled mean temperature gradient between Tb and Tc was +0.14 °C (95% confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.24) and ranged from -1.29 to +1.1 °C. Patients who underwent a decompressive (hemi)craniectomy showed lower Tb values compared to Tc found in three studies. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on Tb and Tc are heterogeneous and show that, on average, Tb and Tc are not clinically significant different in TBI patients (<0.2 °C). Interpretations and interventions of the brain and central temperatures will benefit from standardization of temperature measurements.